• Wei Wu, Yimin Xue, Fenghui Lin, and Dewei Chen.
• The 4th Severe Medical Department Ward, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China. Corresponding author: Wu Wei, Email: 450822736@qq.com.
• Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Dec 1; 31 (12): 1535-1537.

ObjectiveTo investigate the value of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring in the treatment management of patients with severe heart failure.MethodsSixty patients of severe heart failure admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Fujian Provincial Hospital from August 2017 to February 2019 were enrolled, and they were divided into control group and treatment group according to random number table method, with 30 in each group. The treatment group used bedside PiCCO to carry out minimally invasive hemodynamics monitoring, according to the monitoring data target guidance for vasoactive drugs and liquid management. The control group was based only on traditional electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring and lung sound, urine volume of vasoactive drugs and liquid management. The changes of cardiac index (CI), global end diastolic volume index (GEDVI), extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were observed before and 72 hours after treatment in the treatment group. The 7-day total effective rate, the length of ICU stay and 28-day mortality were compared between the two groups.ResultsCompared with before treatment, CI and MAP in the treatment group were significantly increased after treatment [CI (mL×s-1×m-2): 53.34±16.67 vs. 35.01±13.34, MAP (mmHg, 1 mmHg = 0.133 kPa): 72.6±10.6 vs. 62.5±10.3, both P < 0.05], GEDVI, EVLWI, SVRI, CVP were significantly decreased [GEDVI (mL/m2): 760.3±90.2 vs. 960.2±110.3, EVLWI (mL/kg): 6.5±1.3 vs. 12.5±6.2, SVRI (kPa×s×L-1×m-2): 297.3±35.1 vs. 434.1±58.8, CVP (mmHg): 10.1±2.6 vs. 12.2±3.4, all P < 0.05]. Compared with the control group, the 7-day total effective rate of the treatment group was significantly higher (90.0% vs. 80.0%), the length of ICU stay was significantly shorter (days: 8.2±4.5 vs. 10.3±2.5), and the 28-day mortality was significantly lower, with statistically significant difference (all P < 0.05).ConclusionsPiCCO monitoring is a goal-oriented treatment management for patients with severe heart failure, which is helpful to individualized accurate treatment, shorten the length of ICU stay and improve short-term prognosis.

8 keywords...

hide…