• Orthop Traumatol Sur · Sep 2020

    Comparing the outcomes of the induced membrane technique between the tibia and femur: Retrospective single-center study of 33 patients.

    • Alexandre Baud, Xavier Flecher, Richard Alexandre Rochwerger, Jean-Camille Mattei, and Jean Noël Argenson.
    • Orthopaedic and Traumatology Surgery, Hôpital Nord Marseille, 53, chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France. Electronic address: baud.alexandre@gmail.com.
    • Orthop Traumatol Sur. 2020 Sep 1; 106 (5): 789-796.

    IntroductionBone defects are challenging to treat surgically. The primary objective of our study was to compare the union rate and time to union between the tibia and femur when using the induced membrane technique. The secondary objective was to document how failures were managed.Material And MethodsThis retrospective, single-center study involved 33 patients (23 men, 10 women) who were older than 18 years of age. They were treated surgically for a leg fracture or long bone nonunion (22 tibia, 11 femur) using the induced membrane technique between January 2011 and December 2016 and had a complete follow-up. The minimum follow-up was 1 year for fractures and 2 years for non-union cases. Bone union was defined as the presence of at least two cortices with bridging on two radiographic views and return to full weight bearing.ResultsThe mean patient age was 38.3±15.5 years (18-72). The mean bone defect size was 7.9±5.0cm (2.3-18.0). The mean follow-up was 3.3±1.8 years (1-7.2). The union rate was 61% (20 patients). The mean time to union was 10±6.4 months (3-23). The time to union was significantly longer in the tibia (11.6±6.9 months [3-23]) than in the femur (6.3±2.9 months [3.4-10.3]) (p=0.025). The failure rate did not differ between the tibia and femur. Nine of the 13 patients (69%) in which the treatment failed were reoperated; 7 of them underwent nonunion treatment (78%) and 2 underwent amputation (22%). The other 4 patients were waiting for an infection to resolve before being reoperated.ConclusionThe induced membrane technique is an effective surgical procedure for large bone defects in both the tibia and femur. However, the time to union was shorter in the femur than the tibia in our cohort.Level Of EvidenceIV, retrospective study.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…