• Dokuba Tex-Jack and Chinemerem Eleke.
• University of Port Harcourt, African Centre of Excellence, Centre for Public Health and Toxicological Research.
• Afr Health Sci. 2021 Sep 1; 21 (3): 1355-1361.

BackgroundThe World Health Organization recommended less than 10% episiotomy rate for Skilled Birth Attendants (SBAs) and hospitals in 1996. More than two decades afterwards, some health facilities are still grappling with meeting the set target.ObjectivesThis study assessed the perspectives of SBAs and pregnant women regarding episiotomy in a Nigerian university teaching hospital.MethodsA cross-sectional design was employed. Census sampling was used to select 19 SBAS and 973 vaginal birth records from 2019, while consecutive sampling technique was used to enrol 134 consenting pregnant women obtaining antenatal services in the facility. Data was collected using a three part instrument involving a data extraction sheet, episiotomy practice questionnaire for SBAs, and feelings about episiotomy questionnaire for pregnant women. Assembled data were summarised with descriptive statistics.ResultsThe episiotomy rate was 345(35.5%). About 266 (77.1%) of first time mothers (primips) and 79(22.9%) of nonfirst time mothers (multips) received episiotomy. Ten (52.6%) of the SBAs were unsure of any evidence supporting routine episiotomy. All the 19(100%) SBAs reported that there was no existing facility-based policy regarding routine episiotomy. Seventy five (56%) of the pregnant women reported feeling generally bad about episiotomy. One hundred and one (82.3%) of them hinted that they will not feel satisfied if they were given episiotomy with the reason that it ensures quick vaginal birth.ConclusionThe rate of episiotomy was higher than global recommended standards and primips are disproportionately affected. If organised by professional societies, more scientific conferences on limiting episiotomy might remedy this situation.© 2021 Tex-Jack D et al.

13 keywords...

hide…