• Chinese medical journal · Jan 2014

    New disease severity classification of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Shanghai.

    • Guogang Xie, Yingying Zhang, Xin Zhou, and Shanghai Cooperative Group in COPD.
    • Department of Respiratory Medicine, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
    • Chin. Med. J. 2014 Jan 1; 127 (17): 3046-50.

    BackgroundThe Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) presented a new ABCD group classification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to examine the association of spirometric classification and the new GOLD classification with exacerbations, and to compare symptoms in different ways.MethodsWe investigated 848 patients with stable COPD from 24 hospitals. The annual frequencies of acute exacerbation and hospitalization were compared between the old and new classification. The symptom level was assessed using COPD assessment test (CAT) and modified British Medical Research Council (mMRC) questionnaire.ResultsA total of 848 patients were included in this study. According to spirometric classification, there were 32 patients of grade I (3.8%), 315 of grade II (37.1%), 366 of grade III (43.2%), and 135 of grade IV (15.9%). According to GOLD 2011 classification, there were 59 patients of group A (7.0%), 172 of group B (20.3%), 55 of group C (6.5%), and 562 of group D (66.3%). In spirometric classification, the annual frequencies of acute exacerbation and associated hospitalization were respectively 1 (0-3) and 0 (0-2) for grade I; 1 (0-5) and 0 (0-2) for grade II; 2 (0-6) and 1 (0-3) for grade III, and 3 (0-6) and 2 (0-3) for grade IV. In GOLD 2011, respectively 0 (0-3) and 0 (0-1) (group A), 1 (0-4) and 0 (0-3) (group B), 1 (0-5) and 0 (0-3) (group C), and 3 (0-6) and 1 (0-3) (group D). There were no significant difference between group B and C (Z = -1.347, P = 0.178; Z = -0.772, P = 0.440, respectively). The coincidence rate using mMRC = 1 and CAT = 10 as cutoff points was 86.6% (734/848, k = 0.706), compared with 77.9% (661/848, k = 0.60) using mMRC = 2 and CAT = 10.ConclusionsLung function test may be a better predictor of acute exacerbation and associated hospitalization of COPD. It is more appropriate to use mMRC = 1 as cutoff point for assessing COPD symptoms.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.