• Grace Nakibaala, Agnes Watsemba, Brian Ssali, Frank Namugera, Phionah Katushabe, Maggie Carleen, Molly Christiansen, and Emilie Chambert.
• Living Goods, Uganda.
• Afr Health Sci. 2022 Jun 1; 22 (2): 647656647-656.

BackgroundLiving Goods operates a Community Health Worker (CHW) program in 19 districts of Uganda, where CHWs are supervised by full time Community Health Supervisors. This model is effective, but expensive. Evidence indicates that peer supervision can be a substitute and cheaper model for CHW supervision. We describe our experience and outcomes while implementing peer supervision among CHWs in Mayuge district.Objectives1. To compare health services delivery outcomes between the two supervision models. 2. To compare costs of the two supervision models..MethodsInternal organizational records from January to December 2019 were reviewed. Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with participating CHWs were also conducted. Qualitative analysis was performed using thematic content analysis. Quantitative data was summarized to generate averages, percentages and graphs.FindingsCHWs under the peer supervision performed better than those under standard supervision against all key performance indicators. The total cost to maintain the peer supervision model for 1 year was USD $176 per CHW versus USD $273 among CHWs under the standard supervision model. Peer supervision thus resulted in overall cost savings of 36%. There was lower attrition among CHWs under peer supervision compared to standard supervision (10% versus 17%).ConclusionsPeer supervision is a feasible and more affordable model of supervising CHWs.© 2022 Nakibaala G et al.

8 keywords...

hide…