• Pedro Gabriel Pito, Ezequiel Moreira Gonçalves, Vitor Hugo Fernando de Oliveira, Rafael Deminice, Luis Alberto Gobbo, and Débora Alves Guariglia.
• North of Parana State University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
• Nutrition. 2023 Aug 1; 112: 112059112059.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of lipodystrophy and physical exercise on the parameters of bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) of people living with HIV (PLWHIV).MethodsSeventy patients were divided into two groups: PLWHIV with lipodystrophy (PLWHIV-L) and PLWHIV without lipodystrophy (PLWHIV-NL). The phase angle (PhA) and the BIVA were determined from the values of resistance and reactance collected by the BIS. The percentage of fat mass and lean soft tissue (LST) were determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. For comparisons between the PLWHIV-L and PLWHIV-NL groups, the t test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney test was used. From the BIVA, the average of the impedance vectors of the two groups was calculated with the 95% confidence ellipse, and the individual vectors of the patients divided by sex were also compared with the tolerance ellipses of 50%, 75%, and 95% of the healthy reference population. The relationships between the variables of interest were determined by the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient and the coefficient of determination. Analysis of covariance was used for comparisons between groups, adjusted for possible confounding variables.ResultsPLWIV-L showed better hydration conditions (P <0.01), higher LST (P <0.01), and lower percent of fat mass (P <0.01). No differences in PhA were observed between PLWHIV who practiced or did not practice physical exercise. There was a significant difference between the impedance vectors of the groups with and without lipodystrophy (T = 42.4 and P <0.01). Additionally, most of the patients who were positioned beyond the ellipse limits of 50% of tolerance fell into the areas of edema and cachexia. The extracellular to intracellular water ratio explained 81% of the PhA variations. When PhA was adjusted for height2, fat mass/height2 and LST, it was significantly different between groups of the female sex (PhA: P <0.01).ConclusionLipodystrophy and the practice of physical exercise do not present direct involvement in the PhA values, with sex, body composition, and hydration variables being the main influences on this variable. BIVA was able to show differences in the body composition of the groups even when the PhA values were similar.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…