• Lingyan Jiang, Yanjun Deng, Fuqi Xu, Shigang Qiao, and Chen Wang.
• Faculty of Anesthesiology, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou Science and Technology Town Hospital, Suzhou, China; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
• J Clin Anesth. 2024 Jun 1; 94: 111397111397.

BackgroundThe determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values in patients undergoing general anesthesia remains controversial. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) directed individualized PEEP has emerged as a novel approach to PEEP setting and has garnered increasing attention. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the effect of EIT-guided PEEP setting compared to traditional fixed PEEP values or other PEEP titration strategies in patients undergoing general anesthesia.MethodsA comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted from inception to January 2023, with no language restrictions. The search terms used were "EIT"and "PEEP" with their corresponding free words. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The primary outcomes of interest were oxygenation index (OI), lung compliance, and number of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and number of vasoactive drug injections. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data and draw the forest plot, and Stata 14.2 software was used to conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the results.Results5 studies involving 272 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Our findings suggest that EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting is superior to traditional fixed PEEP values and other individualized PEEP titration methods in terms of intraoperative OI(OR = 95.73, 95%CI: (49.10, 142.37); P < 0.0001) and lung compliance(OR = 7.69, 95%CI: (5.55, 9.83); P < 0.00001), without affecting intraoperative hemodynamic parameters such as MAP(OR = 2.07, 95%CI: (-1.00, 5.13); P = 0.19) and the number of intravenous vasoactive drugs(OR = 1.22, 95%CI: (0.68, 2.21); P = 0.51) or increasing the incidence of postoperative PPCs(OR = 0.87, 95%CI: (0.41, 1.82); P = 0.71).ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting in improving intraoperative oxygenation and lung compliance in patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, further research is needed to establish conclusive evidence, and caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings as the current literature remains inconclusive regarding the impact on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

20 keywords...

hide…