• Hafsa Abdul Ghafoor and HussainSyed SheerazSSDepartment of Orthodontics, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan..
• Department of Orthodontics, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.
• J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024 Aug 1; 34 (8): 927931927-931.

Objective To determine the effect of tongue position on facial morphology of Pakistani adults and different growth patterns.Study Design Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Orthodontics, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, from January to April 2021.Methodology The study included individuals aged 17 to 30 years with no history of prior orthodontic treatment, absence of wound, burn, or scar tissue in the neck region, comfortable breathing through the nose, absence of deglutition disorder, and a skeletal Class I or II relationship. The exclusion criteria were a cleft lip or palate, or a history of chronic mouth breathing, snoring, or tonsillectomy. According to their skeletal relationships, the subjects were split into three groups; Group I (low-angle), Group II (normal growth), and Group III (high-angle). Vertical growth pattern was assessed on radiograph by interpreting the values of NS / ML (nasion-sella / mandibular plane) angle, and angle formed between FH / ML (Frankfort horizontal plane / mandibular plane). A predesigned proforma was used to record all the measurements made on pre-treatment lateral cephalograms by the sole investigator. Data were analysed using SPSS 24.0.Results Data from the lateral cephalogram of 79 patients, consisting of 18 (22.8%) males and 61 (77.2%) females who met the inclusion criteria, were analysed. The sample included 15 low-angle, 45 normal vertical growth, and 19 high-angle cases. Fifty participants had Class I skeletal relationships, while 29 had Class II relationships. According to the ANOVA test, FH / ML and NS / ML measurements showed no statistically significant variations in tongue position and growth trends.ConclusionThere was no statistically significant difference between tongue position and facial morphology of Class I or II subjects with different vertical growth patterns. However, there was a statistically sufficient evidence showing the tongue height was greater in Class I skeletal relationship patients as compared to Class II skeletal cases (p = 0.008).Key WordsTongue position, Tongue space, Tongue length, Growth pattern.

16 keywords...

hide…