• Jakub Stępniewski, Łukasz Wilczek, Marcin Waligóra, Kamil Jonas, Wojciech Magoń, Romana Furtak, Andrzej Curzytek, Marcin Kurzyna, Aleksander Araszkiewicz, Marzena Frołow, Piotr Pruszczyk, and Grzegorz Kopeć.
• Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, St. John Paul II Hospital, Kraków, Poland
• Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2024 Oct 30; 134 (10).

IntroductionAcute pulmonary embolism (APE) poses significant diagnostic challenges, with potentially fatal outcomes if not promptly identified and treated. Despite the availability of clinical guidelines, adherence to diagnostic strategies varies globally, impacting patient outcomes.ObjectivesOur aim was to investigate current practices for PE diagnosis among Polish physicians and their adherence to the contemporary 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines.Patients And MethodsThis cross‑sectional study, utilizing a web‑based survey developed with the Delphi methodology, included hospital‑based physicians of various specialties from Poland. The survey focused on diagnostic practices, risk stratification, and adherence to the ESC 2019 guidelines for PE.ResultsThe study showed a limited use of guideline‑recommended clinical prediction rules, with predominant reliance on D‑dimer assessment and computed tomography pulmonary angiography. Risk stratification practices varied, and were often based on individual experience rather than evidence‑based strategies. The vast majority of physicians (80.5%) had never contacted a PE response team, but 88% stated that they would if it were available. Cardiologists were more likely to employ guideline‑recommended methods than other specialists.ConclusionsThere is a need for increased adherence to guideline‑recommended diagnostic and risk stratification strategies in APE among physicians in Poland. Enhancing the availability of PE response teams and promoting guideline‑directed practices could improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

32 keywords...

hide…