-
- Weijian Song, Jianwei Shi, Minjun Du, Mei Liang, Boxuan Zhou, Linchuan Liang, and Yushun Gao.
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Chaoyang District, Panjiayuan, Nanli 17, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China.
- Postgrad Med J. 2024 Dec 18.
PurposeThis study aims to explore the potential causal relationship between gut microbiota and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).MethodsA bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted using genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from gut microbiota and LUSC. Gut microbiota served as the exposure factor, with instrumental variables selected from a GWAS involving 18 340 participants. LUSC data were drawn from a European cohort including 29 266 LUSC cases and 56 450 controls. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary method, with the Benjamini-Hochberg method applied to adjust for multiple comparisons. An independent dataset (ieu-a-967, containing 3275 LUSC cases and 15 038 controls) was used for replication analysis to ensure robustness.ResultsIVW analysis found that Butyricicoccus (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99, P = .042) and Coprobacter (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.97, P = .018) were significantly protective against LUSC. In contrast, Victivallis (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, P = .045) and Ruminococcus (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.03-1.60, P = .028) increased LUSC risk. Replication analysis in the independent dataset confirmed significant associations for Ruminococcus and Coprobacter. No reverse causality or pleiotropy was detected.ConclusionThis study provides evidence of a causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and LUSC risk, highlighting new microbial targets for potential prevention and treatment strategies in lung cancer. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Previous studies have suggested potential links between gut microbiota composition and the development of various cancers, including lung cancer. However, the exact causal relationship between specific gut microbiota and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) has remained unclear. Traditional observational studies have struggled to determine the direction of causality due to confounding factors, making further investigation necessary through more robust methods such as Mendelian randomization (MR). What this study adds? This bidirectional MR study provides novel genetic evidence indicating that certain gut microbiotas are causally associated with LUSC risk. Specifically, Butyricicoccus appears to reduce the risk of LUSC, while Victivallis increases the risk. These findings highlight the role of the gut-lung axis in LUSC and open up new avenues for exploring gut microbiota as potential modulators of lung cancer risk. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy? The implications of this study may significantly influence future research into cancer prevention strategies by targeting gut microbiota. Additionally, it could inform clinical practices aimed at modulating gut microbiota to lower the risk of LUSC, potentially influencing dietary or probiotic interventions to reduce cancer susceptibility. Furthermore, these results might shape public health policies that focus on the gut-lung axis as a novel avenue for cancer prevention and management.© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.