• G Bacle, E Marteau, M Freslon, P Desmoineaux, Y Saint-Cast, R Lancigu, Y Kerjean, E Vernet, J Fournier, P Corcia, D Le Nen, F Rabarin, and J Laulan.
• Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique 1 et 2, Unité de Chirurgie de la Main, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, 37044 Tours cedex, France. Electronic address: bacle.guillaume@wanadoo.fr.
• Orthop Traumatol Sur. 2014 Jun 1;100(4 Suppl):S205-8.

BackgroundCubital tunnel syndrome is the second most frequent entrapment syndrome. Physiopathology is mixed, and treatment options are multiple, none having yet proved superior efficacy.ObjectivesThe present retrospective multicenter study compared results and rates of complications and recurrence between the 4 main cubital tunnel syndrome treatments, to identify trends and optimize outcome.Materialand MethodsPatients presenting with primary clinical cubital tunnel syndrome diagnosed on electroneuromyography were included and operated on using 1 of the following 4 techniques: open or endoscopic in situ decompression, or subcutaneous or submuscular anterior transposition. Four specialized upper-limb surgery centers participated, each systematically performing 1 of the above procedures. Subjective and objective results and rates of complications and recurrence were compared at end of follow-up.ResultsFive hundred and two patients were included and 375 followed up for a mean 92 months (range, 9-144 months); 103 were lost to follow-up and 24 died. Whichever the procedure, more than 90% of patients were cured or showed improvement. There was a single case of scar pain at end of follow-up, managed by endoscopic decompression; there were no other long-term complications. None of the 4 techniques aggravated symptoms. There were 6 recurrences by end of follow-up: 1 associated with open in situ decompression and 5 with submuscular transposition.ConclusionSurgery was effective in treating cubital tunnel syndrome. Submuscular anterior transposition was associated with recurrence. In contrast to literature reports, subcutaneous anterior transposition, which is a reliable and valid technique, was not associated with a higher complication rate than in situ decompression.Level Of EvidenceLevel IV. Multicenter retrospective.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

31 keywords...

hide…