• NeuroImage · Jan 2011

    Relative utility for hemispheric lateralization of different clinical fMRI activation tasks within a comprehensive language paradigm battery in brain tumor patients as assessed by both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent analysis methods.

    • Jay J Pillai and Domenico Zaca.
    • Division of Neuroradiology, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. jpillai1@jhmi.edu
    • Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54 Suppl 1:S136-45.

    AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the relative effectiveness of 6 different commonly used language fMRI activation paradigms, including receptive and expressive, as well as semantic and phonological tasks, for hemispheric lateralization in brain tumor patients utilizing both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent approaches. We studied 46 right-handed patients with primary intra-axial brain tumors with BOLD fMRI on a 3-T MRI system. A linear fit of the laterality indices (LIs) as a function of the t-value (which varied from 2.0 to 6.5) was calculated and the slope (M) taken as measure of LI variability in the threshold-dependent LI approach; for the threshold-independent approach, the LIs were determined by comparing the integrated T-score weighted distributions of all positively task-correlated voxels of the left and the right hemispheric regions of interest. We demonstrated that silent word generation (SWG) and rhyming (R) were the two expressive tasks that provided the best hemispheric language lateralization in this group, based on concordant threshold-dependent and threshold-independent analyses. Furthermore, R (mean LI value=61.91, M=7.9±1.5) had a higher mean LI value and was less threshold-dependent than SWG (mean LI=52.97, M=11.40±0.64) for LI determination. SWG and R were able to provide effective language lateralization even in the subgroup of patients with lesions located in the left hemisphere and in the frontal or parietal lobes. The receptive language paradigms examined in this study (passive listening [PL], listening comprehension [LC], and reading comprehension [RC]) were less effective than SWG and R for language lateralization.Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…