• J Holsheimer, E A Dijkstra, H Demeulemeester, and B Nuttin.
• Department of Electrical Engineering, Institute for Biomedical Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, NL-7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. j.holsheimer@el.utwente.nl
• J. Neurosci. Methods. 2000 Apr 1;97(1):45-50.

AbstractTo determine the rheobase and the chronaxie of excitable cells from strength-duration curves both constant-current pulses and constant-voltage pulses are applied. Since the complex impedance of the electrode-tissue interface varies with both the pulsewidth and the stimulation voltage, chronaxie values estimated from voltage-duration measurements will differ from the proper values as determined from current-duration measurements. To allow a comparison of chronaxie values obtained by the two stimulation methods, voltage-duration curves were measured in human subjects with a deep brain stimulation electrode implanted, while the current and the load impedance of the stimulation circuit were determined in vitro as a function of both stimulation voltage and pulsewidth. Chronaxie values calculated from voltage-duration data were shown to be 30-40% below those estimated from current-duration data. It was also shown that in the normal range of stimulation amplitudes (up to 7 V) the load impedance increases almost linearly with the pulsewidth. This result led us to present a simple method to convert voltage-duration data into current-duration data, thereby reducing the error in the calculated chronaxie values to approximately 6%. For this purpose voltage-duration data have to be measured for pulses up to 10-20 times the expected chronaxie.

22 keywords...

hide…