• Marie-Alexia Ottenin, Adrien Jacquot, Olivier Grospretre, Alain Noël, Sophie Lecocq, Matthias Louis, and Alain Blum.
• Service d'Imagerie Guilloz, CHU Nancy, 29 Ave du maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, CO n 34, Nancy 54035, France. ma.ottenin@orange.fr
• AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan 1;198(1):180-6.

ObjectiveThe purpose of our study was to define the diagnostic value of tomosynthesis compared with standard radiography and CT in wrist injuries.Materials And MethodsOne hundred consecutive patients with acute wrist trauma were investigated with standard radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT. Reference results were those obtained with CT; follow-up monitoring of the patients; and, in some cases, MRI (n=13). Three readers interpreted the findings independently, each using a PACS workstation, and categorized the cases into four groups: fracture of the radius, fracture of the scaphoid, fracture of another bone, and absence of fracture.ResultsFifty-seven percent of the patients had a fracture. The interobserver kappa value varied between 0.54 and 0.59 for standard radiography, between 0.66 and 0.69 for tomosynthesis, and between 0.84 and 0.89 for CT. The sensitivity of standard radiography varied between 61% and 80% and specificity between 65% and 83%. The sensitivity of tomosynthesis ranged between 77% and 87%, and specificity between 76% and 82%. Ranges of sensitivity and specificity for CT were 93-95%, and 86-95%, respectively.ConclusionThe diagnostic value of tomosynthesis is superior to that of standard radiography but inferior to that of CT.

21 keywords...

hide…