-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.
- Clément Buléon, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Anne Lesage, Wilfried Grandin, Emmanuel Pouliquen, Frédéric Flais, Thérèse Simonet, Jean-Louis Gérard, and Jean-Luc Hanouz.
- Caen University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Caen, F-14000, France. buleon-c@chu-caen.fr
- Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr 1;30(4):163-9.
ContextPlastic single-use laryngoscope blades have been found to increase the difficulty of intubation. Metallic single-use blades may represent an alternative.ObjectiveTo compare the rates of intubation failure at first laryngoscopy using metallic single-use, plastic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades.DesignRandomised, superiority, single-centre, controlled trial.SettingOperating theatres at a University Hospital from January 2008 to August 2009.PatientsA total of 1863 adults requiring general anaesthesia.InterventionPatients were randomised to one of three laryngoscope blades: metallic single-use, plastic single-use or metallic reusable.Main Outcome MeasureThe primary end-point was the number of intubation failures at first laryngoscopy. Secondary end-points were glottic exposure and the Intubation Difficulty Scale.ResultsThe failure rate (absolute difference: 95% confidence interval) at the first attempt was greater for the plastic single-use blades (8.1%) than for the metallic reusable [3.2% (4.9%: 2.2 to 7.6%); P < 0.001] and metallic reusable blades [4.0% (4.0%: 1.2 to 6.9%); P < 0.006]. No difference was found between the metallic reusable and metallic single-use groups (0.9%: -1.3 to 3.1%). Scoring on the Intubation Difficulty Scale [median (interquartile range)] was higher in the plastic single-use group [1 (0 to 2)] than in the metallic groups [metallic reusable: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.001 and metallic single-use: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.007] groups. Glottic exposure was significantly better in the metallic reusable group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 3.7%) compared with the plastic single-use group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 9.4%; P < 0.03).ConclusionThe rates of failed intubation at first laryngoscopy were similar in the metallic reusable and metallic reusable groups, but greater in the plastic single-use group.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.