• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Apr 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Comparison of plastic and metallic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades: a randomised controlled trial.

    • Clément Buléon, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Anne Lesage, Wilfried Grandin, Emmanuel Pouliquen, Frédéric Flais, Thérèse Simonet, Jean-Louis Gérard, and Jean-Luc Hanouz.
    • Caen University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Caen, F-14000, France. buleon-c@chu-caen.fr
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Apr 1;30(4):163-9.

    ContextPlastic single-use laryngoscope blades have been found to increase the difficulty of intubation. Metallic single-use blades may represent an alternative.ObjectiveTo compare the rates of intubation failure at first laryngoscopy using metallic single-use, plastic single-use and metallic reusable laryngoscope blades.DesignRandomised, superiority, single-centre, controlled trial.SettingOperating theatres at a University Hospital from January 2008 to August 2009.PatientsA total of 1863 adults requiring general anaesthesia.InterventionPatients were randomised to one of three laryngoscope blades: metallic single-use, plastic single-use or metallic reusable.Main Outcome MeasureThe primary end-point was the number of intubation failures at first laryngoscopy. Secondary end-points were glottic exposure and the Intubation Difficulty Scale.ResultsThe failure rate (absolute difference: 95% confidence interval) at the first attempt was greater for the plastic single-use blades (8.1%) than for the metallic reusable [3.2% (4.9%: 2.2 to 7.6%); P < 0.001] and metallic reusable blades [4.0% (4.0%: 1.2 to 6.9%); P < 0.006]. No difference was found between the metallic reusable and metallic single-use groups (0.9%: -1.3 to 3.1%). Scoring on the Intubation Difficulty Scale [median (interquartile range)] was higher in the plastic single-use group [1 (0 to 2)] than in the metallic groups [metallic reusable: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.001 and metallic single-use: 0 (0 to 1); P < 0.007] groups. Glottic exposure was significantly better in the metallic reusable group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 3.7%) compared with the plastic single-use group (modified Cormack & Lehane score III and IV: 9.4%; P < 0.03).ConclusionThe rates of failed intubation at first laryngoscopy were similar in the metallic reusable and metallic reusable groups, but greater in the plastic single-use group.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…