• S Madi-Jebara, D Khater-Rassi, A Yazigi, F Haddad, G Hayek, R Achkouty, and M C Antakly.
• Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, hôpital Hôtel-Dieu de France, Beyrouth, Liban. smj20@hotmail.com
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2002 Mar 1; 21 (3): 205-10.

ObjectiveCompare the efficacy of isradipine to that of nicardipine for the control of arterial hypertension following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).Study DesignClinical prospective, randomised study.Material And Methods40 patients ASA II or III, mean age 66 +/- 8 years, scheduled for elective CABG were included. If the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was > or = 100 mmHg within the first six post operative hours, the patients were included and randomly attributed to either one of the 2 groups: Gr I (n = 20) received nicardipine, Gr II (n = 20) received isradipine in bolus then in continuous perfusion. HR, MAP, MPAP, CVP, PCWP, CI, SVRI, PVRI and SVI were recorded at: T0 before administration of drugs, T1 = 2 min after the first bolus. T2 when MAP reached 85 +/- 5 mmHg. T3, T4, T5, T6, T7 and T8 at 5, 10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after the continuous perfusion. T9 before stopping the perfusion.ResultsNo significant changes in HR, CVP, PCWP, MPAP or PVRI at any time in both groups. Significant increase in CI at T2 in both groups. Reduction of MAP at T2 was more important (-27%) in Gr I compared to that in Gr II (-22%). This was mainly due to a significant decrease in SVRI.ConclusionIsradipine is effective in the treatment of arterial hypertension following CABG. However there is not any significant beneficial effect of isradipine over nicardipine.

23 keywords...

hide…