Preventive medicine
-
Preventive medicine · Dec 2022
Economic analysis of financial incentives for smoking cessation during pregnancy and postpartum.
Higgins and colleagues' recently-completed randomized controlled trial and pooled data with 4 related trials of smoking cessation in pregnant women in Vermont (USA) showed that abstinence-contingent financial incentives (FI) increased abstinence over control conditions from early pregnancy through 24-weeks postpartum. Control conditions were best practices (BP) alone in the recent trial and payments provided independent of smoking status (noncontingently) in the others. This paper reports economic analyses of abstinence-contingent FI. ⋯ Each dollar invested in abstinence-contingent FI over control smoking-cessation programs yielded $4.20 in economic benefits in the recent trial and $11.90 in the pooled trials (very favorable benefit-cost ratios). Medicaid and commercial insurers may wish to consider covering financial incentives for smoking abstinence as a cost-effective service for pregnant beneficiaries who smoke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02210832.
-
Preventive medicine · Dec 2022
Reimagining public safety: Public opinion on police reform and gun violence prevention by race and gun ownership in the United States.
Inequitable experiences of community gun violence and victimization by police use of force led to nationwide calls to "reimagine public safety" in 2020. In January 2021, we examined public support among U. S. adults for 7 policy approaches to reforming policing and investing in community gun violence prevention. ⋯ Gun owners overall reported lower support for public safety reforms and investments than respondents who did not own guns, but this distinction was found to be driven by White gun owners. The views of Black gun owners were indistinguishable from Black non-owners and were similar to White non-owners on most issues. These findings suggest that broad public support exists for innovative violence reduction strategies and public safety reforms.
-
Preventive medicine · Dec 2022
Historical redlining and the epidemiology of present-day firearm violence in the United States: A multi-city analysis.
Firearm violence is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and racial health disparities in the United States. Previous studies have identified associations between historically racist housing discrimination (i.e., redlining practices) and firearm violence; however, these studies generally have been limited to a single city and have yet to provide sufficient evidence through which to determine the extent and dynamics of the impact of this relationship across the country. The aim of our study was (1) to estimate the association of historical redlining on both violent and firearm death across the country in nested models; and (2) to examine spatial non-stationarity to determine whether the impact of historical redlining on violent and firearm death was the same across the U. ⋯ Associations were not stable across cities. For example, associations were relatively stronger in Baltimore, MD and weaker in Los Angeles, CA. This research reinforces the findings of previous studies examining the impact of redlining on firearm death across the extent of the entire country in 21 cities and claim that HOLC grades are associated with present-day violence.
-
Gun violence is frequently described in the language of epidemics. Yet, few quantitative studies have generated convincing evidence on the most basic question underlying the epidemic model of violence: Does violence at time t beget violence at time t + 1? With a sample of 98 of the 100 largest U. S. cities from 2014 to 2020, we employ an instrumental variable approach developed in (Jacob et al., 2007) that uses weather conditions in a given week to instrument for shootings in the same week. ⋯ However, in years when cities went through sharp increases in gun violence, the prevalence of shootings in a given week has a strong, positive, causal effect on shootings in the following week. These results suggest that the relationship between current and subsequent violence is not static, but varies across different places and time periods. The results have implications for understanding how violence builds on itself during periods of sharp change.