Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparing the efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide, ondansetron, and placebo in cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia.
To compare the relative efficacy of prophylactic metoclopramide, ondansetron, and placebo in nonemergent cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia intraoperatively and for the first 24-hour period after delivery. ⋯ In cesarean section patients given epidural anesthesia, prophylactic ondansetron, 4 mg IV, is more efficacious and has a higher patient satisfaction than that with metoclopramide, 10 mg IV, or placebo in preventing nausea and achieving complete responses during intraoperative period and the first 24-hour postdelivery period. However, there is no difference between ondansetron and metoclopramide in reducing frequency of vomiting. Prophylactic ondansetron 4 mg IV is more effective in preventing nausea than vomiting.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Air-oxygen mixtures in circle systems.
To determine the effect of different air-O(2) mixtures and fresh gas flows (FGF) on the relationship between the delivered (F(Del)O(2)) and inspired O(2) fraction (FIO(2)) in a circle system. ⋯ When using air-O(2) mixtures in a circle system, FIO(2) becomes lower than the F(Del)O(2) with FGF < or = 2 L/min. The relative proportion of O(2) in the FGF has to be increased accordingly.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Suppression of cough during emergence from general anesthesia: laryngotracheal lidocaine through a modified endotracheal tube.
To ascertain if coughing during emergence from general anesthesia can be suppressed with a modified endotracheal tube. ⋯ The technique of laryngotracheal topical lidocaine administered by the LITA tube can, in most cases, provide a smooth emergence from general anesthesia without coughing.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Does functional ability in the postoperative period differ between remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia?
To compare patients' functional ability in the 24-hour postoperative period following a remifentanil compared to a hypnotic-fentanyl-treated anesthesia regimen using a 24-Hour Functional Ability Questionnaire. ⋯ A remifentanil-treated anesthetic demonstrated earlier return to some functions than a fentanyl-treated technique. Although functional assessment is a field that is still in its infancy, a questionnaire to assess functional ability during the 24 hours after anesthesia may provide more practical information about anesthetic recovery than previously used, traditional psychomotor evaluations.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Hemodynamics and emergence profile of remifentanil versus fentanyl prospectively compared in a large population of surgical patients.
To compare the responses to, and hemodynamics associated with surgical stress, recovery profiles, and anesthesiologists' satisfaction following balanced general anesthesia using either remifentanil or fentanyl in a large-scale population. ⋯ This study confirms previous observations on the hemodynamic properties associated with remifentanil and extends these to a wider context than previously reported. These characteristics provide clinicians with an alternative in opioid-based anesthesia.