Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology
-
We compared our new sedation technique with propofol during spinal anesthesia (Group B, n = 50) with a previously described method by Mackenzie et al. (Group A, n = 20). In Group A, propofol was started at a rate of 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 10 minutes, followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 4 mg.kg-1.h-1 till the end of surgery. In Group B, propofol 0.4 mg.kg-1 was administered by a bolus injection at the beginning. ⋯ The blood concentrations of propofol in Group B was 0.946 +/- 0.076 microgram.ml-1 and 0.693 +/- 0.136 microgram.ml-1 at 5 minutes and 10 minutes after the beginning of propofol, respectively. These values were significantly lower than those reported by Kugimiya. Our newly developed method for sedation with propofol during spinal anesthesia would be safer and more effective than that previously described by Mackenzie et al.
-
Hypertrophied lingual tonsils are rare, but may cause difficulty or inability in tracheal intubation during induction of general anesthesia. A 39-yr-old woman was scheduled for resection of symptomatic hypertrophied lingual tonsils. ⋯ However, transnasal fiberoscopic monitoring could guide the orotracheal fiber into the trachea for intubation. When an anesthesiologist can predict the abnormality of lingual tonsils, this combination might be recommended for difficult airway and intubation.
-
Biography Historical Article
[New study on the history of anesthesiology (2)--who is the first Japanese to write a scientific paper for the journal "Anesthesiology"?].
The beginning of modern anesthesiology in Japan dates back to 1950 when Dr M. Saklad of Rhode Island Hospital came to Japan to give his lectures on endotracheal anesthesia and related procedures. Since then, many Japanese surgeons visited the United States to learn anesthesiology in depth and they began to write their papers for foreign journals. ⋯ The first paper based on studies performed in Japan by Japanese authors appeared in 1956. It was entitled as "The spread of drugs used for spinal anesthesia" by Kitahara et al. This paper is the English translation of their Japanese paper which appeared in Nippon Rinsho Geka Ikai Zasshi entitled as "Basic Study on Spinal Anesthesia in 1953".
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Total intravenous anesthesia with Diprivan (1% propofol emulsion) using a manual drip-infusion technique].
Continuous intravenous administration of Diprivan (1% propofol emulsion, P) is usually carried out using a syringe-pump or an infusion-pump to adjust the infusion rate. We assessed the accuracy of the infusion dose of P and the serum concentration of propofol by manual controls during anesthesia. Twenty eight patients, anesthetized with oxygen, P and vecuronium in combination with fentanyl and epidural block were randomly assigned to either of the following groups; P was administered using the drip-infusion (the group D, n = 14) or a syringe-pump (the group S; n = 14). ⋯ The Vc was well correlated with the Vm in the group D (r = 0.976) and in the group S (r = 0.974). Mean serum propofol concentrations of the group D and S were 2.50 +/- 0.57 and 2.35 +/- 0.62 micrograms.ml-1, respectively. The results suggest that the drip-infusion technique of P may be substituted safely by the syringe-pump for continuous total intravenous anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[The effects of intravenous anesthetics, propofol, fentanyl and ketamine on the excitability of spinal motoneuron in human: an F-wave study].
We have investigated the effects of various intravenous anesthetics, propofol, fentanyl and ketamine on the excitability of spinal motoneuron using an F-wave analysis in a total of 28 patients. All patients were divided randomly into three groups as follows; 2 mg.kg-1 intravenous bolus injection followed by 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion of propofol (P group), 1 mg.kg-1 intravenous bolus injection followed by 1 mg.kg-1.h-1 infusion of ketamine (K group), and 5 micrograms.kg-1 injection of fentanyl (F group). The F-wave was determined after supramaximal electrostimulation of the median nerve in distal point. ⋯ We found a significant (P = 0.018) reduction of the persistence from 77.5 +/- 15.2 to 40.9 +/- 16.8% in the propofol group. On the other hand, no significant changes in F-wave parameters were found in ketamine, or fentanyl group. These results suggested that motoneuron excitability in spinal cord could be inhibited by anesthetic dose of propofol, but not by ketamine or fentanyl.