Knowledge
Collections of articles, notes and knowledge from the metajournal community.
Airway
Analgesia
Anesthesia
Complications
Covid
Critical care
Decision making
Drugs
Epidural
Intrathecal
Intravenous anesthetics
Neuromuscular agents
Obstetric anesthesia
Opioid
Pain
Pediatric anesthesia
Perioperative medicine
Postoperative complications
Regional anesthesia
Sugammadex
-
-
-
-
-
Is the conventional assumption that left-lateral tilt and uterine displacement avoids aortocaval compression during Caesarean section actually valid?
50 years of assumed orthodoxy is challenged by studies showing that:
- True aortal compression is relatively uncommon (Higuchi 2015, Lee 2012).
- Caval compression is probably near-universal, but also usually not improved by a mere 15 degree tilt. (An impractical 30 degrees is more likely required for meaningful impact!) (Palmer 2015).
- Caval compression probably has limited haemodynamic or fetal consequences in the fit, well, term parturient (Higuchi 2015; Lee 2012).
- Judicious use of vasopressor infusions may obviate the need for traditional uterine displacement (Lee 2017; Farber 2017).
Time to change practice then?
Not quite yet...
summary